Sunday, March 28, 2010
Friday, March 12, 2010
Not again!?
Lehman used Repo 105 for no articulated business purpose except "to reduce balance sheet at the quarter–end." Rather than sell assets at a loss, "[a] Repo 105 increase would help avoid this without negatively impacting our leverage ratios." Lehman’s Global Financial Controller confirmed that "the only purpose or motive for [Repo 105] transactions was reduction in the balance sheet" and that "there was no substance to the transactions."
But the decision not to disclose the effects of those judgments does give rise to colorable claims against the senior officers who oversaw and certified misleading financial statements – Lehman’s CEO Richard S. Fuld, Jr., and its CFOs Christopher O’Meara, Erin M. Callan and Ian T. Lowitt. There are colorable claims against Lehman’s external auditor Ernst & Young for, among other things, its failure to question and challenge improper or inadequate disclosures in those financial statements.
Ernst & Young was advised by Lee on June 12, 2008 that Lehman used $50 billion of Repo 105 transactions to temporarily move assets off balance sheet and quarter end. The next day ‐ on June 13, 2008 ‐ Ernst & Young met with the Lehman Board Audit Committee but did not advise it about Lee’s assertions, despite an express direction from the Committee to advise on all allegations raised by Lee.
http://lehmanreport.jenner.com/
But the decision not to disclose the effects of those judgments does give rise to colorable claims against the senior officers who oversaw and certified misleading financial statements – Lehman’s CEO Richard S. Fuld, Jr., and its CFOs Christopher O’Meara, Erin M. Callan and Ian T. Lowitt. There are colorable claims against Lehman’s external auditor Ernst & Young for, among other things, its failure to question and challenge improper or inadequate disclosures in those financial statements.
Ernst & Young was advised by Lee on June 12, 2008 that Lehman used $50 billion of Repo 105 transactions to temporarily move assets off balance sheet and quarter end. The next day ‐ on June 13, 2008 ‐ Ernst & Young met with the Lehman Board Audit Committee but did not advise it about Lee’s assertions, despite an express direction from the Committee to advise on all allegations raised by Lee.
http://lehmanreport.jenner.com/
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Top 25 Market Cap Companies
1 Exxon Mobil XOM $316B
2 Microsoft MSFT $253B
3 Wal-Mart WMT $204B
4 Apple AAPL $203B
5 Procter & Gamble PG $183B
6 Johnson & Johnson JNJ $176B
7 General Electric GE $175B
8 Bank of America BAC $172B
9 JPMorgan Chase JPM $170B
10 International Business Machines IBM $162B
11 AT&T T $150B
12 Wells Fargo WFC $152B
13 Cisco Systems CSCO $148B
14 Chevron CVX $147B
15 Pfizer PFE $138B
16 Google GOOG $138B
17 Berkshire Hathaway BRK $136B
18 Coca-Cola KO $124B
19 Oracle ORCL $124B
20 Hewlett-Packard HPQ $121B
21 Intel INTC $116B
22 Merck MRK $114B
23 Citigroup C $113B
24 Pepsi PEP $100B
25 Philip Morris PM $94B
2 Microsoft MSFT $253B
3 Wal-Mart WMT $204B
4 Apple AAPL $203B
5 Procter & Gamble PG $183B
6 Johnson & Johnson JNJ $176B
7 General Electric GE $175B
8 Bank of America BAC $172B
9 JPMorgan Chase JPM $170B
10 International Business Machines IBM $162B
11 AT&T T $150B
12 Wells Fargo WFC $152B
13 Cisco Systems CSCO $148B
14 Chevron CVX $147B
15 Pfizer PFE $138B
16 Google GOOG $138B
17 Berkshire Hathaway BRK $136B
18 Coca-Cola KO $124B
19 Oracle ORCL $124B
20 Hewlett-Packard HPQ $121B
21 Intel INTC $116B
22 Merck MRK $114B
23 Citigroup C $113B
24 Pepsi PEP $100B
25 Philip Morris PM $94B
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
